
I've been giving a great deal of thought lately to the First Nations land disputes in Caledonia and, now, in Hagersville. At first glance, it reminded me of the horrible spiraling-out-of-control that took place at Ipperwash. (And, as a kid that grew up in Sarnia, Ipperwash was definitely something that we felt resonate throughout the community.)
As the Caledonia dispute wages on, a new one has popped onto the local map. Hagersville has become the most recent hot zone. The masses of non-First Nations people in the areas surrounding Caledonia and Hagersville are rather upset about these two land claims (to put it nicely). The First Nations people, (who, without a doubt were given the short end of the stick by the government in past decades), feel justified in their actions.
The obvious question, then, that causes debates to arise and tempers to soar is:
who is right?
Should the First Nations people be allowed to reclaim these areas of land? What becomes of the people that currently own the land? Is it their fault that the government screwed over the First Nations people so many years ago? How do we remedy these issues justly and peaceably?
All of these questions I have wrestled with for over a year now as the land claim dispute wages on.
Now, in Hagersville, this issue is re-ignited. More fuel is added to an already tense fire that Caledonians and others in the surrounded area have been living in for the past year and a half. Native land claims on a new development have caused further protests. Hagersville lies almost directly between Ancaster/Hamilton West Mountain and Port Dover, and as the summer season is upon us, there are obvious concerns. Port Dover being the "beach of choice" for many residents need to go through Hagersville to get there. If beach traffic is halted, more tempers will rise.
The Hagersville dispute causes a domino-effect that falls into a hot-bed of other issues: re-raised claims of the 1/2 mile land claim on either side of the Grand River; problems communicating with the Canadian government; unsettled people on both sides of the dispute; and an disunited front amongst the Six Nations leaders. Kate Harries, a Globe and Times reporter writes:
One of the difficulties at Six Nations is a blurred division of responsibilities - with the traditional Confederacy chiefs handling negotiations to end the 15-month Caledonia dispute, and elected Chief David General and a divided council handling administration.
With all of these things in mind (and many that this young writer has no clue of), one can imagine the intense mix of emotions and growing impatience on both sides of the dispute.
There is another issue in this manner that I have been thinking about rather a lot.
One question that has been asked very little of, and one that I now have questioned is:
how has this effected not only the relations between First Nations and non-First Nations, but also, how has this effected the children in the surrounding areas?
I have heard stories from teachers in the Caledonia area that note the obvious division between First Nation and non-First Nation children. Young children who already discriminate based on race from an early age. (White/Black/Asian/Hispanic) Parents who don't let their kids associate with First Nation kids...what the heck is that? What are we teaching our children? How has this land claim dispute defaced the Canadian mosaic?
We need to be conscious of how our words and actions effect children. There is no clear-cut answer in this dispute. (If there were, it would have been over a year ago.) However, there is a protocol that we, as moral Canadians, should follow when it comes to such issues:
to seek justice in each situation; to be honest; to be fair; and to resolve issues showing that both sides have been given equal consideration.
What this looks like in the end, I don't know; however, I do know that it doesn't come out with a younger generation that has racist sentiments against the First Nations people.
Those are just my thoughts. I'd love to hear yours.